Legal Opinion
Dahler v. All Persons, Etc.
California Supreme Court
Decided June 22, 1912No. S.F. No. 5622PublishedCited by 6 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
A hearing in Bank was ordered after judgment of affirmance in Department.
After further consideration we are entirely satisfied of the correctness of the views expressed by the Department and adopt the opinion of Henshaw, J., reading in substance as follows:—
“This is an action to quiet title under the provisions of the McEnerney Act. Plaintiff claimed title through her husband, who in turn, deraigned title from the Market & Stanyan streets & Golden Gate Park Land & Improvement Company. Appellants’ contention in effect is that Henry M. G. Dahler, husband of plaintiff, had reconveyed the land in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Glos v. CessnaIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
- Botsford v. EyraudCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
3Cited by6 opinions
- Vanderbilt v. All Persons, Etc.California Supreme Court · 1912
- People v. StuckrathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Downing v. McGrathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Downing v. McGrathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Downing v. McGrathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.