Legal Opinion

State v. Cherry County

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1899No. 10814PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Holmes, J. The conid should declare the bonds invalid on the ground that the notice of the election at which they were voted was insufficient. (Lawson v. Gibson, 18 Neb. 137; State v. Cornell, 54 Neb. 647; Early v. Doe, 16 ITow. [U. S.] 609; Whitaker v. Beach, 12 Kan. 492; McCurdy v. Baker, 11 Kan. Ill; Know County v. Ninth Nat.

Read the full summary

Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Holmes, J. The conid should declare the bonds invalid on the ground that the notice of the election at which they were voted was insufficient. (Lawson v. Gibson, 18 Neb. 137; State v. Cornell, 54 Neb. 647; Early v. Doe, 16 ITow. [U. S.] 609; Whitaker v. Beach, 12 Kan. 492; McCurdy v. Baker, 11 Kan. Ill; Know County v. Ninth Nat. Bank, 147 U. S. 91; State v. Yellow Jaded, 5 Nev. 415; Savings & Loam, Society v. Thompson, 32 Cal. 347; Bunco v. Reed, 16 Barb. [N. Y.] 347; Market Nat. Bank v. Pacific Nat. Bank, 89 N. Y. 397;…

1Opinion of the CourtN Or Val, J.

The electors of Cherry county, at the general election held in said county in November, 1898, voted upon, and carried, the proposition to issue «$12,000 in county bonds for the purpose of erecting a court house. The bonds were issued by the authorities of the counl y, and were by the auditor of public accounts registered in his office. The board of educational lands and funds agreed with the county authorities to purchase the bonds as an investment for the permanent school fund in case the bonds were legal and valid obligations. A dispute having arisen between said board and the county with…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Market National Bank v. Pacific National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Lawson v. GibsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  3. State v. Yellow Jacket Silver Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Bacon v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Boyd v. McFarlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Harris v. HansonNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Haas v. Commissioners of Lincoln ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Seccombe v. RoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  4. Watson v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Myakka Co. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Florida · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API