Legal Opinion

Wilkins v. Wilkinson

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 2004No. 03AP-502PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Klatt, Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Randolph Wilkins, appeals from the decision and judgment entry of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas granting summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees, Reginald Wilkinson, Cynthia Mausser, Trayce Thalheimer, and the Ohio Parole Board, and denying Wilkins’s motion for summary judgment. Because the use of videoconferencing technology for witness testimony during the parole-revocation hearing satisfied the Confrontation Clause under these circumstances, we affirm.

{¶2} On December 31, 1997, while on parole from a 1985 rape conviction,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State ex rel. Grady v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Coventry Township v. EckerOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Koos v. Central Ohio Cellular, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Wright v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Marsh v. Tibbals (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. Moore, Unpublished Decision (2-23-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. State v. FearsOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. State ex rel. Cartwright v. Ohio Adult Parole Bd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. State ex rel. Cartwright v. Ohio Adult Parole Bd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API