Legal Opinion

Soundview Pulp Co. v. Taylor

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1944No. 29297PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.

Originally three actions were commenced against Jack Taylor, as commissioner of public lands: one by the Soundview Pulp Company, one by the state of Washington on the relation of Coos Bay Pulp Corporation, and another by the latter corporation in its own behalf. In this opinion, the parties will be referred to as Soundview, respondent, and appellant, respectively.

Soundview had been the highest bidder at a public sale of timber grown on state school lands, but was informed by the office of price administration that its bid was in excess of the ceiling price for the timber as provided under…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. United States v. Jin Fuey MoySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. South Carolina v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Case v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. State v. Northwest Magnesite Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Hammack v. Monroe Street Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Hauser v. ArnessWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Public Utility District No. 1 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API