Legal Opinion
Hauser v. Arness
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 4, 1954No. 32675PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.
— Plaintiffs brought this action to enjoin defendants from using lots 52, 53, 54, and 55 of Kingston Beach Tracts in Kitsap county near the town of Kingston for log dumping and booming operations. The trial court found that defendants’ log dumping and booming were being carried on in violation of the Kitsap county zoning ordinance and consequently constituted a nuisance.
The court entered a decree permanently enjoining the defendants from dumping or booming logs “on, over or across” the aforesaid lots and from filling in the tideland area in front of the lots and using the fill abutting the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Washington Ex Rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. RobergeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Forbes v. HubbardIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
- Landay v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lillions v. GibbsWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Pierce v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. SpinoWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Morin v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Kane v. KlosWashington Supreme Court · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.