Legal Opinion
In Re Simon
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 9, 2011No. 067340Published
1Opinion of the Court
20 A.3d 421 (2011)
206 N.J. 306
In the Matter of Richard J. SIMON, An Attorney at Law.
No. 067340.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued May 3, 2011.
Decided June 9, 2011.
Janice L. Richter, Deputy Ethics Counsel, argued the cause on behalf of the Office of Attorney Ethics.
Joseph J. Benedict argued the cause for respondent (Benedict and Altman, attorneys; Mr. Benedict and Philip Nettl, New Brunswick, on the brief).
Judge STERN (temporarily assigned) delivered the opinion of the Court.
This ethics proceeding involves the age-old conflict between an attorney's obligation to represent a client diligently…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jacobs v. PENDELNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- State v. FergusonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- State v. JohnsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- In Re LoringSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Matter of BerkowitzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.