Nicoll v. Rudnick
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KANE, J.
In the 1860’s, J.W. Nicoll constructed a three-mile-long ditch (the Nicoll Ditch) to convey water from the south fork of the Kern River to his 300.5-acre property. A 1902 judgment confirmed his right to appropriate a defined quantity of water from the Kern River through the Nicoll Ditch for use on the property. The subject property consisted of two contiguous parcels of land—an upslope parcel of 142.79 acres referred to as Nicoll Ranch, and a downslope parcel of 157.70 acres referred to as Nicoll Field. In 1933, the parcel known as Nicoll Field was foreclosed on by the bank,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Crocker National Bank v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- United States v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Stanislaus Water Co. v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- People v. ShirokowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Nguyen v. CalhounCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Orange Cove Irrigation Dist. v. L. Molinos Mut. Water Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Great Oaks Water Co. v. Santa Clara Valley Water Dist., California Court of Appeal, 6th District2015
- Abatti v. Imperial Irrigation Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Abatti v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.