Legal Opinion
A.S. v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 9, 2014No. 14-1229PublishedCited by 94 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHWARTZ, Circuit Judge.
A.S. and Sallee Miller (“Plaintiffs”) filed suit in Pennsylvania state court against GlaxoSmithKline LLC (“GSK”) claiming that its drug, Paxil, caused birth defects. GSK removed the case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The District Court 1 remanded the case, finding that GSK was a citizen of Pennsylvania and therefore ineligible to remove the case. After remand, our Court decided Johnson v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 724 F.3d 337 (3d Cir.2013), in which we held that GSK was a citizen of Delaware. Within thirty days of…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Tara Luevano v. Walmart Stores, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Sherry J. Oshiver v. Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & BermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Judon v. Travelers Property Casualty Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Barbara McLaren v. The UPS Store IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- Dana Nessel v. Enbridge Energy, LPCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
- League of Women Voters of Penn v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Boggs v. HarrisDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.