State v. Zempel
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was indicted for, and after trial in the district court of Blue Earth county was convicted of, the crime of rape, and was sentenced to hard labor in the State prison at Stillwater for the term of nine years. From an order, Cray, J., denying- defendant’s motion for a new trial and from the judgment of conviction, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
This appeal is from an order denying the motion for a new trial after a conviction for the crime of rape. The assignments of ’error question the correctness and sufficiency of certain instructions given by the trial court, and the correctness of a ruling which excluded certain letters; but the principal reliance seems to be placed upon the claim that the evidence is not sufficient to justify the verdict of guilty.
The appellant makes numerous assignments of error which are predicated upon the alleged failure of the court to instruct, or to instruct fully, upon certain questions of law. No…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mobile Fruit & Trading Co. v. PotterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. SailorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- State v. TownleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Bailey v. Grand Forks Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- State v. DaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.