State v. Miller
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. U. S. Webb, Attorney-General,, and George A. Sturtevant, Deputy Attorney-General, and H. W. A. Weske, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Henry Hemker died in this state, intestate, on May 9, 1903. His estate was duly administered by the defendant, and on February 27, 1905, upon settlement of the final account therein, it was adjudged that the defendant had in his hands belonging to said estate, for distribution, the sum of $2,053.55 in money. No person having ever claimed as heir, or otherwise, any part of the estate, the- attorney-general on May 15, 1905, began this proceeding by information, under section 1269 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to obtain a judgment of the court declaring said property escheated and the title…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. PalmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Bates v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- People ex rel. Attorney-General v. RoachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- People v. FitzpatrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Phelan v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Johns v. ScobieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Estate of FriedmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Coomes v. FineganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- Martin v. McGrathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Estate of LindquistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.