Legal Opinion
Stevenson v. Blue Cross
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 24, 1991No. 87-07020, 86-15450; CA A63987PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.
Claimant petitions for judicial review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order that held that her tendonitis is not compensable and that denied her penalties and attorney fees on that claim. We affirm.
The Board found:
“In November, 1984, claimant began working for the employer as a staple clerk; she became a file clerk after six months. Subsequently, claimant began exhibiting a rash, red sores, itchiness, and bumps on her hands.
“On October 3,1985, she submitted an 801 form regarding the rash and open sores on her hands. The claim referenced an August 10, 1985 date of injury or diagnosis. Dr.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Bauman v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Johnson v. Spectra PhysicsOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. PiwowarOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Dethlefs v. Hyster Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
3Cited by6 opinions
- SAIF Corp. v. TullCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Saif Corp. v. Siegrist (In re Comp. of Siegrist)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Rouse v. FMC Corp. Marine-RailCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- SAIF Corp. v. TullCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- SAIF Corp. v. TullCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.