Legal Opinion
SAIF Corp. v. Tull
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 10, 1992No. WCB 88-17674; CA A68781Published
1Opinion of the Court
832 P.2d 1271 (1992)
113 Or. App. 449
In the Matter of the Compensation of Karen M. TULL, Claimant.
SAIF CORPORATION and Columbia Health Care, Petitioners,
v.
Karen M. TULL, Respondent.
WCB 88-17674; CA A68781.
Court of Appeals of Oregon, In Banc[*].
Argued and Submitted November 27, 1991.
Resubmitted April 15, 1992.
Decided June 10, 1992.
David L. Runner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen. and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.
Robert A. Lucas, Rainier, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.
Resubmitted in…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bauman v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Johnson v. Spectra PhysicsOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Stovall v. Sally Salmon SeafoodOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Booth v. Tektronix, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- SAIF Corp. v. TullCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.