Legal Opinion

Nunamaker for Use v. Finnegan

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 1933No. Appeal 171PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

Under the assignments of error and statement of questions involved, our sole inquiry upon this appeal relates to the validity of a writ of scire facias, issued under the Act of April 10, 1929, P. L. 479, to bring upon the record an additional defendant. The action below was trespass on behalf of the minor plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by him as the result of an automobile accident (a right angle collision at the intersection of two streets in the city of Erie) which occurred while he was riding on a truck operated by the original…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Goldman v. Mitchell-Fletcher Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Stone v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Shaw v. MegargeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Builders Supply Co. v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Rudman Et Ux. v. City of ScrantonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Majewski v. LempkaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Clineff v. Rubash (Goldsmith)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Aultman v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API