Legal Opinion
In re the Interest of L.F.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided September 12, 2002No. 01CA2350PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge ROTHENBERG.
In this child support proceeding between Ronald R. Thomasson (father) and Patricia J. Fielder (mother), the sole issue is whether the district court erred in ruling that the adjustment for transportation expenses in § 14-10-115(18)(a)(IT), C.R.S.2001, is limited as a matter of law to those expenses incurred in long distance or interstate travel and does not apply to automobile expenses incurred in transporting a child between the homes of *1250the parents. Because we conclude the trial court erred in so ruling, we vacate the district court order adopting the magistrate's…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. TollefsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
- Pediatric Neurosurgery, P.C. v. RussellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Humane Society of the Pikes Peak Region v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- Obert v. Colorado Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Colorado Springs Disposal v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. DuncanColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- In the Interest of K.M.B.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- Grynberg v. Arkansas Oklahoma Gas Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2005
- Proactive Technologies, Inc. v. Denver Place Associates Ltd. PartnershipColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- In Re LFColorado Court of Appeals · 2002