Legal Opinion

Proactive Technologies, Inc. v. Denver Place Associates Ltd. Partnership

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 2006No. 04CA2613PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge TAUBMAN.

In this case concerning the recovery of consequential damages for the commercially unreasonable sale of collateral, plaintiff, Proactive Technologies, Inc., appeals the trial *960court’s summary judgment in favor of defendant, Denver Place Associates Limited Partnership. We affirm.

In 1994, Denver Place leased space to Proactive under a commercial lease. In 1995, Proactive defaulted twice on its obligations under the lease, and in November of that year, it entered into a settlement agreement obligating it to make payments to Denver Place, in return for which it could remain…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Klinger v. Adams County School District No. 50Supreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  2. Wolford v. Pinnacol AssuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  3. Alamosa National Bank v. San Luis Valley Grain Growers, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. People v. NovitskiyColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Suffield Bank v. LaRocheDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. ArzabalaColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Salt and Light Energy Equipment LLC v. Origin BancorpDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2024
  3. United States v. Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad Company, TheDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API