Legal Opinion

Grynberg v. Arkansas Oklahoma Gas Corp.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 24, 2005No. 03CA1320PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by:

Judge TAUBMAN.

In this ease dealing with a working interest and royalty interests in a natural gas well, plaintiffs, Jack and Celeste Grynberg, appeal the trial court’s judgment dismissing five of their claims and its grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants, Arkansas Oklahoma Gas Corporation (AOG) and its president, Mike Carter, on their sixth claim. We affirm.

I. Background

Jack Grynberg owns a 29.84934% working interest in gas production from the Powell C-l Unit Well in Sequoyah County, Oklahoma. His wife, Celeste Grynberg, holds overriding royalty interests in the same…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rue v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Bebo Construction Co. v. Mattox & O'Brien, P.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  3. Hendricks v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  4. People v. HickmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  5. Salida School District R-32-J v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tonko v. MallowSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  2. Nichols v. BD. OF COUNTY COM'RS OF LA PLATA, COLO.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  3. Adams County Department of Social Services v. Sutherland-Minor (In Re Sutherland-Minor)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2006
  4. Huffman v. Westmoreland Coal Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Elletson v. RiggleDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API