Legal Opinion

Wise v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 25, 1933No. 6755PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from an instructed verdict. Plaintiff, suing on a war risk insurance policy, was unable to make out a ease which in the opinion of the trial court entitled him to have a jury verdict on his claim that in 1919, when he paid his last premium, he was totally and permanently disabled within the meaning of his policy. He claims here that the conclusion which the District Judge reached was a conclusion, not of law, but of fact. That the ease was taken from the jury to be decided on its facts by the judge. As evidence of this, he points to the memorandum…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Eggen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  3. Nicolay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  4. Reid v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  5. United States v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Falbo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  2. Aylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  3. Cunningham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  4. Brownell v. Tide Water Associated Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
  5. United States v. HowardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API