Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1901PublishedCited by 7 opinions

FROM WASHING-TON. Appeal from tbe Chancery Court of Washington County. Robebt Burrows., Spl. Oh.

1Opinion of the CourtBeard, J.

This case involves the construction of the following clause in the will of the late J"ohn T. Smith, to-wit.: “I will and bequeath to my beloved wife ... all my real estate . . . after the payment of my just debts.”

“After the death of my wife ... I will and bequeath to my son, Samuel E. Smith, and his heirs, equal shares in my home farm . . . .”

The testator left surviving him a widow and his son, Samuel E. Smith, who, at the death of the testator, had several living children. Between the date of the testator’s death, and the death of his widow, other children were born to Samuel. These…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boyd v. RobinsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Puryear v. EdmondsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Grimes v. OrrandTennessee Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tate v. TateTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Sanders v. ByromTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Laisure v. RichardsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Walker v. AppleburyTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Harwell v. HarwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API