Laisure v. Richards
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom Howard Circuit Court; William C. Purdum, Judge. Action by Mary A. Laisure and others against Robert O. Richards for partition, in which defendant filed a cross-complaint. Prom the judgment rendered, certain of the plaintiffs appeal. '
1Opinion of the CourtHottel, P. J.
In this case the issues of fact determined by the judgment of the trial court were presented by a complaint and a cross-complaint and a general denial to each.
The complaint was filed by the appellants Mary A. Laisure, Abner H. Ratcliff and Silas G. Ratcliff and the cross-complaint by appellee Robert O. Richards, Both the complaint and the cross-complaint sought to partition and quiet title to the same real estate, particularly described in each pleading, and such pleadings contained substantially the same averments, the difference between them being that the complaint alleged that appellants…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- In Re the Appraisal Under the Transfer Tax Acts of the Property of KimberlyNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Everitt v. . EverittNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Ferrer v. . PyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Matter of HoffmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- In Re the Accounting of KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Curry v. CurryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Brown v. SchafferIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
- Runyan v. RiversIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934
- Piersol v. HaysIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
- Dickey v. Citizens State Bk. of FairmountIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.