Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Robinson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1893PublishedCited by 24 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal from Chancery Court of Shelby County. W. D. BeaRd, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.

The main purpose of this first-named cause is to have the Court construe the wills of John B. and William H. Robinson, devising property valued at over $100,000.

The original bill was filed by Alston Boyd' and wife, Leila R. Boyd, Alston Boyd as administrator de bonis non of John B. Robinson, deceased, and *4of William H. Robinson, deceased, and by Alston Boyd as the next friend of bis five minor children, namely: Bessie, Mary, Alston, Jr., Leila, and Martha Boyd, against Enla 0. Robinson (now Farnsworth) in her own right, and against Eula 0. Robinson (now Farnsworth) and L. B. McFarland, as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beloit v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Franklin v. FranklinTennessee Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Oman v. DeliusTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Harris v. MasonTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Hail v. Nashville Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
  4. Mason v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  5. Roberts v. FroggeTennessee Supreme Court · 1923

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API