Walker v. Applebury
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dyer
This case requires us to determine whether certain devises in the will of Lena Feezor, deceased are controlled by the “Tennessee Class Doctrine” enunciated in Satterfield v. Mayes, 30 Tenn. 58 (1849). This will is as follows:
Feb. 28, 1935 8 P.M.
The Smith Newton place, except what I want Will Gay to have I will to- my husband Barney Feezor his life time and at his death bach to the Applebury’s, but at amy time he becomes neglent in keeping it in repair and willfully let any of the buildings decay S fall I want it sold to the highest bidder and the proceeds to go to the Applebury kin The place…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Tate v. TateTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
- Jennings v. JenningsTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
- Forrest v. PorchTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
- Burdick v. GilpinTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
- Nichols v. GuthrieTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rutherford County v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
- Nicholson v. NicholsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
- Rutherford County v. Martha Jordan WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
- Rutherford County v. Martha WilsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
- Rutherford County v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.