Legal Opinion

Howard v. Howard

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 12, 1956No. Civ. 21321PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant husband from an order denying appellant’s motion asking that the county clerk be directed to enter a full satisfaction of an interlocutory judgment of divorce as respects an attorney fee of $15,690 and costs, and that the sheriff cease making further levies of execution to collect interest on said attorney fees. There is no controversy in respect to the attorney fees ordered to he paid to the wife’s attorney, and the only question here involved relates to whether interest thereon is allowable.

The interlocutory judgment, dated June 5, 1952, ordered appellant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Huellmantel v. HuellmantelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. McNabb v. McNabbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Howard v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arnold v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  2. Williams v. BudkeMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Pinecrest Productions, Inc. v. RKO Teleradio Pictures, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Strand v. DespainIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Huntley v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API