Huellmantel v. Huellmantel
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. George H. Bahrs, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Divorce. The case was here on appeal once before, and was remanded, with directions that “all that part of the judgment which undertakes to determine and dispose of the real property described in the complaint is reversed, and as to all that part of the judgment the order denying a new trial is reversed and a new trial is ordered.” The decree granting plaintiff a divorce and alimony and counsel fees, and the order refusing new trial as to this part of the decree, were affirmed. (Huellmantel v. Huellmantel, 117 Cal. 407.) At the time of his marriage with plaintiff defendant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Burkett v. BurkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Petaluma Savings Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Huellmantel v. HuellmantelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by25 opinions
- Sanguinetti v. SanguinettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Tremper v. TremperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- McAneny v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cty.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Lent v. HC Morris Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- McNabb v. McNabbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.