Legal Opinion

Strand v. Despain

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1957No. 8577PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEETON, Chief Justice.

The parties to this action were divorced in Franklin County May 17, 1944. Custody of a female child, born July 18, 1940, was awarded to plaintiff, appellant. The decree contains a provision requiring respondent husband to pay $20 per week “for the support of the plaintiff and said child.”

In a supplemental proceeding plaintiff sought to have determined what portion of the $20 per week is alimony and what portion is for the support of the minor child, and claimed a balance due on the decree entered in the divorce proceeding of $10,260. On issues joined the court determined…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Despain v. DespainIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Mauldin v. Sunshine Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Brown v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Bashor v. BeloitIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Howard v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Graham v. Larry Donohoe LoggingIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Raymond v. RaymondSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  3. Bonaparte v. NeffIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Graham v. Larry Donohoe LoggingIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Raymond v. RaymondSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API