Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Arnold

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 8, 1966No. 51972PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRawlings, J.

Appeal by defendant from a supplemental judgment entered in the trial court following issuance of procedendo on prior appeal. Arnold v. Arnold, 257 Iowa 429, 133 N.W.2d 53.

He now contends the supplemental judgment did not comply with the mandate of this court.

The original decree entered September 27, 1963, so far as is here material, provided as follows: That defendant pay $180 each month for support of three children, commencing October 1963, vested title to the home property in plaintiff and ordered defendant to satisfy the first half of taxes for 1962, payable January 1, 1963; gave to…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Gregory v. GregoryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  2. Whittier v. WhittierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  3. Arnold v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  4. Lynch v. UhlenhoppSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  5. De La Rama v. De La RamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Lien v. LienSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Ezzone v. RiccardiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  3. Marjorie Louise Dabney v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated, and Honeywell, IncCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  4. Dillon v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  5. Raper v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API