Legal Opinion

Barham v. Kayser-Roth Hosiery Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 2, 1972No. 7215IC467PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Defendants concede that G.S. 97-47 has no application to the facts of this case so that the only question presented is: Whether the North Carolina Industrial Commission had jurisdiction when plaintiff did not file a claim with the Commission and no claim was filed on his behalf within the time allowed by G.S. 97-24(a)? This question must be answered in the negative. G.S. 97-24 (a) provides:

“The right to compensation under this Article shall be forever barred unless a claim be filed with the Industrial Commission within two years after the accident, and if death results from the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hart v. Thomasville Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Montgomery v. Horneytown Fire DepartmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Tabron v. Gold Leaf Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Parker v. Thompson-Arthur Paving Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Reinhardt v. Women's Pavilion, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Dowdy v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Craver v. Dixie Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Poythress v. JP Stevens and Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API