Barham v. Kayser-Roth Hosiery Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
Defendants concede that G.S. 97-47 has no application to the facts of this case so that the only question presented is: Whether the North Carolina Industrial Commission had jurisdiction when plaintiff did not file a claim with the Commission and no claim was filed on his behalf within the time allowed by G.S. 97-24(a)? This question must be answered in the negative. G.S. 97-24 (a) provides:
“The right to compensation under this Article shall be forever barred unless a claim be filed with the Industrial Commission within two years after the accident, and if death results from the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hart v. Thomasville Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Montgomery v. Horneytown Fire DepartmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Tabron v. Gold Leaf Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
3Cited by23 opinions
- Parker v. Thompson-Arthur Paving Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Reinhardt v. Women's Pavilion, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Dowdy v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Craver v. Dixie Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Poythress v. JP Stevens and Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.