Legal Opinion
Ben Diskin D/B/A Mass. State Mfg. Co. v. J.P. Stevens & Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided January 22, 1988No. 87-1234PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
The appellant, who appears pro se, appeals from the district court’s order granting appellee’s motion for a stay of the court proceedings pending arbitration pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 3. The district court’s decision is reported. See Diskin v. J.P. Stevens & Co., 652 F.Supp. 553 (D.Mass.1987). At the outset, we consider whether the order is immediately appealable.
A stay issued under section 3 of the Arbitration Act is normally not appealable since it qualifies as neither “final” under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 nor as an “injunction” under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). See, e.g., Hartford Financial Systems v.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Enelow v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Ettelson v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- In re the Arbitration between Marlene Industries Corp. & Carnac Textiles, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Mathewson Corporation v. Allied Marine Industries, Inc., Brad Foote Gear Works, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Schubtex, Inc. v. Allen Snyder, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Avedon Engineering, Inc. v. SeatexCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- C9 Ventures v. SVC-West, L.P.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Bergquist Co. v. Sunroc Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Pch Mut. Ins. Co., Inc. v. Casualty & Surety, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Alloy Computer Products, Inc. v. Northern Telecom, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.