Alloy Computer Products, Inc. v. Northern Telecom, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TAURO, District Judge.
Plaintiff designs and manufactures equipment to expand the capacity and improve the performance of personal-computers. One of plaintiff’s products is the “QICTAPE” line of tape drive systems for IBM personal computers.
Defendant manufactures “tape drive units”, which plaintiff used in making its QICTAPE systems. According to the amended complaint, 1 defendant had represented that its tape drives were equipped with ceramic-coated magnetic heads having a minimum life of 1500 hours. Without informing plaintiff, defendant allegedly provided cheaper, non-ceramic…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Teradyne, Inc. v. Mostek Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Roto-Lith, Ltd. v. F. P. Bartlett & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962
- Luria Brothers & Co., Inc. v. Pielet Brothers Scrap Iron & Metal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Gilbert & Bennett Manufacturing Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1977
- Rite Fabrics, Inc. v. Stafford-Higgins Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ritchie Enterprises v. Honeywell Bull, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- Logan Equipment Corp. v. Simon Aerials, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990
- Winter Panel Corp. v. Reichhold Chemicals, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1993
- Master Palletizer Systems, Inc. v. T.S. Ragsdale Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1989
- BOC Group, Inc. v. Chevron Chemical Co., LLCNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.