Legal Opinion
Kari Sehie v. City of Aurora
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 27, 2005No. 04-2308PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
Kari Sehie, a former emergency dispatcher for the City of Aurora (“Aurora”), sued her former employer for claims arising from the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§'207, 216 (2005). The parties stipulated to the facts and the district court entered judgment in favor of Sehie. The issue before us is whether the time Sehie spent attending and traveling to and from counseling sessions that Aurora mandated are compensable under the FLSA. We agree with the district court that this time is compensable, and affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
Aurora hired Sehie as an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Susan E. Hess v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Moldenhauer v. Tazewell-Pekin Consolidated Communications CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Costello v. GrundonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Callahan v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Pakovich v. Broadspire Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.