Legal Opinion

Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1898No. S. F. No. 683PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco; J. C. B. Hebbard, Judge. Action by M. W. Fox against the Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Company and others. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff, as a stockholder in the corporate defendant named, against the corporation, the directors thereof, and various other persons, charging a fraudulent conspiracy between the directors and others to cheat and defraud the corporation. Among other preliminary allegations, the plaintiff charges that Hayward and Hobart were largely the owners of the stock in the Nevada Mill and Mining Company, and controlled and managed the Mexican Mill, and that they conspired with other persons to defraud the Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Company. For that purpose they procured…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Insurance Companies v. WeidesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Hunter v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Insurance Co. v. WeideSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Insurance Company v. WeideSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  5. Wallace v. SissonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gray v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Steinbauer v. BondesenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Gray v. CottonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Mining Securities Co. v. WallMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Mason v. San-Val Oil & Water Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API