Legal Opinion

Cate v. Popejoy

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided November 2, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McAMIS. J.

This action was instituted to recover the premiums’ paid by complainant upon a life insurance policy or benefit certificate upon the life of her father, the defendant N. Popejoy, in which complainant was named as beneficiary. The bill alleges that about the year 1923 an agreement was entered into between defendant N. Popejoy and complainant and her mother to the effect that defendant would become insured in the Amra Grotto, a fraternal benefit association, and that complainant and her mother, in consideration of the payment of premiums, would be named as beneficiaries. The predicate…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gordon v. SpellmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  2. Ex Parte JowellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  4. Roy v. PosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Williams v. BuntinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Owens v. ChurchCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API