Legal Opinion

Owens v. Church

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 15, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONNER, Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellees, Lillie Owens and Neal Vaughn, sued their aunt, defendant-*179appellant, Almira Church,1 age 91, for specific performance of a contract under which it was alleged she agreed to will them all her property in exchange for their agreement to care for her for the balance of her life.

Ms. Church denied the existence of the agreement and asserted that, in any event, specific performance was not warranted. After a bench trial, the chancellor determined that a contract did exist. However, the trial court at first refused to grant specific performance on the theory…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Capital City Bank v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
  2. Ludwicki v. GuerinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Murtha v. DonohooWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Matthews v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
  5. Williams v. BuntinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re: Estate of Alton Wayne SaddlerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
  2. Jerry LaQuiere v. Daniel W. McCollumCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API