Legal Opinion

United States v. Mayes

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided April 7, 1989No. ACM 27377PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

LEWIS, Senior Judge:

The appellant pleaded guilty to two specifications alleging wrongful use of cocaine. He was sentenced by members to a bad conduct discharge, confinement for 12 months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances and reduction to airman basic. The assigned error before us, as refined by appellate defense counsel during oral argument, is whether the military judge erred in denying a challenge for cause against a member, Lieutenant Colonel (Lt Col) H.

Military appellate courts, while encouraging liberality in rulings on challenges for cause, have nonetheless accorded trial…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. SmartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  2. United States v. HarrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. ReynoldsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. TippitUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  5. United States v. MoyarU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. SloanU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  2. United States v. VegaU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  3. United States v. GadsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  4. United States v. JobsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API