Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Jobson

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided May 16, 1989No. ACM 27310Published

1Concurrence

Senior Judge LEWIS

(concurring):

Senior Judge Kastl’s analysis of the challenge issue is well reasoned and persuasive. However, while reaching the same result as the majority, I do so for another reason.

As the majority recognizes, appellate military courts customarily accord the trial judge great deference in the exercise of discretion on challenge issues. The military judge has the opportunity to observe the demeanor of the challenged member and, thereby, to make an informed judgment concerning his ability to perform judi-

cial responsibilities in a fair and impartial manner. United States v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. ReynoldsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  2. United States v. MurphyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  3. United States v. MayesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API