Legal Opinion

City of Cumming v. Flowers

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 6, 2017No. S16A1884; S16A1885PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NAHMIAS, Justice.

This case involves the procedure by which a local zoning board’s quasi-judicial decision on a variance request may be appealed to the superior court. Kerley Family Homes, LLC (“Kerley”) was granted a variance by the City of Cumming’s Board of Zoning Appeals (“BZA”). Neighboring homeowners aggrieved by the variance sought to appeal the BZA’s decision by filing a complaint seeking a writ of mandamus and an injunction in the superior court. The defendants argued that they were entitled to summary judgment against the homeowners because the zoning variance decision was a…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  2. Woodard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  3. Bentley v. ChastainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  4. Sosniak v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  5. Southall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2022
  2. Worthen v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  3. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2023
  4. Pounds v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
  5. Diversified Holdings, LLP v. City of SuwaneeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API