Legal Opinion
Mattegat v. Klopfenstein
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 25, 1998No. AC 17482PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUPONT, J.
The plaintiffs, Louis J. Mattegat and Melanie Mattegat, appeal from the judgment, rendered after a trial to the court, finding the defendant DUBL M. Enterprises, Inc., doing business as Housemaster of America (Housemaster),1 negligent in the performance of a property inspection contract and awarding damages to the plaintiffs. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly (1) held that the recovery of damages for Housemaster’s negligence was limited to those damages that were reasonably foreseeable, (2) employed the cost to repair the property, rather than…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Johnson v. FlammiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Doe v. ManheimerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Griffin v. Nationwide Moving & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Abrahams v. Young & Rubicam, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Malone v. SantoraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Glassford v. BrickKicker and GDM Home Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- Centimark Corp. v. Village Manor Associates Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Fenton v. Connecticut Hospital Ass'n Workers' Compensation TrustConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Sunnyland Farms, Inc. v. Central New Mexico Electric Cooperative, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Potts v. White Water Mountain Resorts of Ct, No. 550961 (Aug. 24, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.