Dwinnell v. Minneapolis Fire & Marine Mutual Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment of the district court for Hennepin county, entered pursuant to the findings and order of Simpson, J.
1Opinion of the Court
START, 0. J.
The plaintiffs are receivers of the Minneapolis Fire & Marine Insurance Company, hereinafter designated as the company, duly appointed for the purposes of winding up its affairs. They brought this action in the district court of the county of Hennepin to enforce, for the benefit of the creditors of the company, the alleged liability of the defendants upon a guaranty or subscription fund executed by them and represented to constitute a paid-up capital of the company for the purpose of paying its losses. The cause was tried by the court without a jury and resulted in a judgment in…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hospes v. Northwestern Manuf'g & Car Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- First National Bank v. Gustin Minerva Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Harper v. CarrollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Hastings Malting Co. v. Iron Range Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Dwinnell v. KramerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Shell Oil Co. v. KaplerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Penn Anthracite Mining Co. v. Clarkson Securities Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Breen v. CameronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Mitchell v. MortenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Range Ice Fuel Co. Inc. v. Barnsdall Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.