Legal Opinion

McCormick v. Snappy Car Rentals, Inc.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

This appeal involves a single worker’s compensation action arising out of two separate, but successive, injuries to the Plaintiff. The sole issue on appeal concerns the liability of Snappy Car Rentals, Inc. (“Snappy”) and its insuror, Defendants-Appellants, for 25% permanent partial disability to the body as a whole awarded to the employee, Sharon McCormick, Plaintiff-Ap-pellee. Snappy was the employer of the Plaintiff at the time she sustained a com-pensable injury in 1985. Windshield Service Company, Inc., (“Windshield”) was the Plaintiff’s employer when she was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Evans's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Baxter v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Bennett v. Howard Johnsons Motor LodgeTennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Cabe v. Union Carbide Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Mayes v. FidelityTennessee Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lock v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Lindsey v. Strohs CompaniesTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Riley v. Ina/Aetna Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API