Legal Opinion

Lindsey v. Strohs Companies

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1992PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

In this worker’s compensation action, the trial court awarded the employee 100 percent permanent and total disability, denied certain past medical expenses, and placed restrictions on future medical expenses. Part of the award was commuted to lump sum and lump-sum attorney’s fees were allowed. The plaintiff appeals pro se, raising numerous issues, not all of which require discussion. Because we find the trial court erred in commuting both the award and attorney’s fees, in the denial of certain past medical expenses, and the limitation of future medical expenses, we…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Simpson v. Frontier Community Credit UnionTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Lollar v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Russell v. Genesco, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Burris v. Cross Mountain Coal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Van Hooser v. Mueller Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Borner v. AutryTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Stephens v. Henley's Supply & Industry, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Gibeau v. Kollsman Instrument Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Bucher, David v. Diversco/ABM Industries, Inc.Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · 2015
  5. Burnette, Sr., DeWayne v. WestRockTennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · 2017

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API