Legal Opinion

Mayes v. Fidelity

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

This worker’s compensation appeal raises the question of whether mental disturbance resulting from the stress and strain of conducting a contracting business constitutes a compensable injury. After hearing testimony from the witnesses and taking the matter under advisement, the trial judge awarded the Plaintiff temporary total disability, medical expenses, and further found the plaintiff retained a 75% permanent partial disability to the body as a whole for which compensation was awarded in a lump sum payment. We have carefully reviewed the record and the arguments…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jose v. Equifax, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Cabe v. Union Carbide Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Clevenger v. Plexco, Division of Amstead Industries, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gatlin v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Woodlawn Memorial Park, Inc. v. KeithTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Batson v. Cigna Property & Casualty CompaniesTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  4. McCormick v. Snappy Car Rentals, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API