Legal Opinion
Doerfler v. Richman
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 6, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.
In this suit the plaintiffs are seeking to reform and foreclose a real estate mortgage which erroneously described the property intended to be mortgaged as a part of section 26, township 17 south, range 4 west, W. M., whereas it was located in section 23 of said township and range. The description of the mortgaged property as contained in the mortgage is as follows:
“Beginning at a point on the north line of Lot 1, Section 26, Township 17 South, Range 4 West of the Willamette Meridian, Oregon, 16.256 chains West of the Northwest corner of the Solomon Zumwalt Donation Land Claim No. 41, in said…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Curtis v. GoodingIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Quivey v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Conyers v. MericlesIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- McGehee v. Lehman, Durr &Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Blodgett v. HobartSupreme Court of Vermont · 1846
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- De Tweede Northwestern & Pacific Hypotheekbank v. W. M. Barnett EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1938
- Troubled Asset Solutions v. WilcherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020