Legal Opinion
De Tweede Northwestern & Pacific Hypotheekbank v. W. M. Barnett Estate
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 31, 1938PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.
This is a suit for the reformation and foreclosure of a chattel mortgage on one-third of the crop grown on certain described lands in Sherman county, Oregon, during the year 1934. The mortgage was given to the plaintiff on May 1, 1934, by the defendants, Independent Warehouse and Milling Company and The W. M. Barnett Estate.
It is alleged in the complaint that, because of a mutual mistake, the description contained in the chattel mortgage of the lands upon which the mortgaged crop was to be grown failed to include the NE14 of section 25, T. 2 N., R. 16 E., W. M., and the prayer of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lewis v. LewisOregon Supreme Court · 1874
- Evarts v. StegerOregon Supreme Court · 1874
- Meier v. KellyOregon Supreme Court · 1890
- Epstein v. State InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1891
- Brown v. BriggsOregon Supreme Court · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Jensen v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Rayburn Et Ux. v. Crawford Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Pioneer Resources, LLC v. D. R. Johnson Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Bird v. Central Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1941
- A&T Siding, Inc. v. Capitol Specialty Ins. Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.