Legal Opinion
Phelps v. 3PD, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided September 30, 2009No. CV-08-387-HUPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*552OPINION & ORDER
HUBEL, United States Magistrate Judge:
Plaintiffs David Phelps and Max Lugauer bring wage and other claims against defendant 3PD, Inc., based on the allegation that defendant purposefully misclassified plaintiffs, and a class of similarly situated individuals who provide home delivery services for defendant, as “independent contractors,” when in fact, according to plaintiffs, they were defendant’s employees.
Plaintiffs move for certification of a class on certain claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. They also seek appointment of Phelps and Lugauer as class…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- David Hanon v. Dataproducts Corporation Jack C. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Armstrong v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Norris-Wilson v. Delta-T Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2010
- Villalpando v. Exel Direct Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Giles v. St. Charles Health System, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2013
- Global Executive Management Solutions, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.