Villalpando v. Exel Direct Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
Re: Dkt. No. 141
JOSEPH C. SPERO, United States Magistrate Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs in this putative class action are drivers who have provided delivery services for Defendants Exel Direct Inc., DPWN Holdings (USA), Inc. and Deutsche Post Be-teiligungen Holding GmbH (collectively “Exel”) in California. Plaintiffs assert wage and hour claims under California law based on the allegation that Exel has miselassified its drivers as independent contractors. Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (“Motion”), in which…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Soares v. Flowers Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Rivera v. HolderDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2015
- Admiral Insurance v. Kay Automotive Distributors, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Alfred v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2017
- Allen v. Similasan Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.