Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bartrug

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 7, 1999PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOYCE, J.:

¶ 1 Elwood Bartrug, Appellant, appeals the judgment of sentence entered June 22, 1998. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm. Before addressing Appellant’s claim, we will briefly recount the pertinent facts of the case.

¶ 2 On August 18, 1994, Appellant burglarized the victim’s Squirrel Hill residence in Pittsburgh. There were indications that the burglary may have been an “inside job”. Appellant broke and entered through the only window of the residence that was not connected to the alarm system. He proceeded directly to the room where the stolen property, jewelry worth…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael M. Busic, United States of America v. Anthony LaroccaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  2. Pennsylvania v. GoldhammerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. GoldhammerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. GoldhammerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. VanderlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BarnesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Com. v. Prater, W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  3. Commonwealth v. MuhammedSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Com. v. Davis, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. Commonwealth v. FieldsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API