Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Muhammed

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 2010No. 3113 EDA 2008PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

GANTMAN, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Kareem Muhammed, appeals from the judgment of sentence entered in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas following his bench trial convictions for unauthorized transfer of sounds on recording devices and trademark counterfeiting. 1 Appellant asks us to determine whether the trial court erred in denying Appellant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained from what he claims was an unlawful traffic stop. We hold the vehicle stop was lawful, and the court properly denied the suppression motion. Accordingly, we affirm the conviction for unauthorized…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ChaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Commonwealth v. GoldhammerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. StevensonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Commonwealth v. BartrugSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Commonwealth v. VanderlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FeczkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Commonwealth v. ReeseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. BOROVICHKASuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. PostieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Commonwealth v. Pi Delta Psi, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API