Legal Opinion
Nijhawan v. Attorney General of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 2, 2008No. 06-3948PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*389OPINION OF THE COURT
RENDELL, Circuit Judge.
Manoj Nijhawan appeals from the determination of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) that he had committed an aggravated felony and was thus removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(43)(M)(i) because his conspiracy conviction constituted an offense involving fraud or deceit in which the loss to the victims exceeded $10,000. Ni-jhawan challenges both aspects of this finding, the “involving fraud” prong as well as the “loss” aspect. As to the latter, he contends that, in order to satisfy the qualifying language, the loss amount had to have been…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Oyenike Alaka v. Attorney General of the United States Secretary of Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Khaimraj Singh v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Jean-Louis v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Evanson v. Attorney General of United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- United States v. William DahlCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Borrome v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Singh v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.