Singh v. Attorney General of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
VAN ANTWERPEN, Circuit Judge.
Nigel Singh petitions for review of a final order of removal based on his conviction, under 18 U.S.C. § 152(3), for knowingly making a false statement under pen alty of perjury in a bankruptcy proceeding. The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) determined that Singh’s conviction was an offense involving fraud or deceit in which the loss to the victim exceeded $10,000, and hence an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(M)(i). In his petition, Singh argues that 18 U.S.C § 152(3) is a perjury offense that must meet the requirements for…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Rubin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State of Iowa v. John Robert HoymanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- Victor Frutis Salmoran v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Christopher Rad v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Fan Wang v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Willy Rosa v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.