Legal Opinion
Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Columbia Outdoor Advertising Inc. J. Willis Cantey the City of Columbia
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided February 15, 1990No. 88-1388PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPROUSE, Circuit Judge:
The underlying action involves a claim by a billboard company that a rival billboard company and a city government successfully conspired to keep it out of the city. Suit was initiated in 1982 by appellant Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc. (Omni) against the alleged conspirators, Columbia Outdoor Advertising, Inc. (COA), J. Willis Cantey, and the City of Columbia, South Carolina (City), for violation of sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1-2, as well as pendent state claims. Omni sought treble damages under section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Jacobs, Visconsi & Jacobs, Co. v. City of LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Columbia Outdoor Advertising, Inc. J. Willis Cantey the City of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Precision Piping & Instruments, Inc. v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Nobody in Particular Presents, Inc. v. Clear Channel Communications, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.