Legal Opinion

St. Bernard Coal Co. v. Pittsburg Coal Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided July 1, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Case 42 — Application por' Reinstatement op an Injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the court by

JUDGE BURN AM,

overruling application TO REINSTATE.

This is an application under section 297 of the Givil Oode for the reinstatement of an injunction which purports to have been granted and dissolved by the judge of the fourth judicial district. It appears that on the 9th day of May, 1901, D. W. Gatlin, the clerk of the Hopkins circuit court, granted a temporary restraining order in accordance with the prayer of the petition. A motion to dissolve this restraining order was heard by the judge on the first day of June, and he thereupon directed the entry of the following…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Poyntz v. ShackelfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
  2. Matthews v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kilbourn v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Hays v. CombsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  3. Crammond v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  4. Moss v. EubankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  5. Bennett v. BlankenshipCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API